The hot topic in school psychology currently is APA’s proposed Model Act for State Licensure of Psychologists. This document guides state legislators in how they should set up their psychology licensing laws. Previous versions of this document provided an exemption to school psychologists allowing them to use the term school psychologist as long as they were practicing in public schools. The major source of controversy is that APA is trying to remove this exemption so that only doctoral level school psychologists can use the title psychologist and provide psychological services.
As a future Education Specialist (Ed.S.) level school psychologist, this is very troubling. If a state’s legislature adopts the APA model act proposed recommendations, Ed.S. level school psychologists will have to change their title, change their practices, and adjust the services provided while also receiving supervision by a doctoral level licensed psychologist. Also, the rationale behind the APA model act proposal is not based on research evidence that suggests the change is needed or warranted. It really isn’t based on anything. It’s not as if Ed.S. level school psychologists have been found to cause harm.
Ed.S. school psychologists are really needed. There is a growing shortage of school psychologists nationwide, and receiving an Ed.S. in three years rather than completing a 5 year doctoral level program produces the school psychologists needed to fill this gap. Plus, the majority of practicing school psychologists are Ed.S. level. As an Ed.S. student, I definitely feel as though graduate school has provided me with a thorough scientist-practitioner based education that prepares me to serve as a school psychologist in the schools. The National Association of School Psychologists has led a huge effort to keep this act from passing. Let’s hope it has been enough!